Washington v. Briggs & Stratton, LLC
| Rickie Washington |
| Briggs & Stratton, LLC |
| 6:2023cv00066 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA of 1993) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of R. Benjamin McMichael Receipt Number AGASDC-3743589, Fee Amount $200, by Briggs & Stratton, LLC. Responses due by 1/31/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Statement re S.D. Ga. Cases, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Strawn, Bradley) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of R. Benjamin McMichael Receipt Number AGASDC-3743589, Fee Amount $200, (pts) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Briggs & Stratton, LLC answer due 1/26/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 01/12/2024. (ek)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint (Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint). (csr) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) by Briggs & Stratton, LLC. Responses due by 1/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Strawn, Bradley) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting re #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Briggs & Stratton, LLC answer due 1/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/19/23. (loh)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Briggs & Stratton, LLC. Responses due by 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Strawn, Bradley) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (thb) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/21/23. (loh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Briggs & Stratton, LLC. (loh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Briggs & Stratton, LLC, filed by Rickie Washington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(loh) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3708223. (loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Washington v. Briggs & Stratton, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rickie Washington | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Billips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Briggs & Stratton, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bradley E. Strawn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
