McCormack et al v. Reinke et al
| Robert J McCormack, Daniel Cippewa and David Baker |
| Jeff Kirkham, Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Terry Kirkham, Kevin Kemp, Michael Johnson, Jay Christensen, Liz Neville and Marty Saudermann |
| 1:2012cv00016 |
| January 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Candy W Dale |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. All claims against Defendants Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Terry Kirkham, Kevin Kemp, Michael Johnson, Jay Christensen, Liz Neville, Marty Saundermann, Jeff Kirkham are dismissed. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 24 Notice and Request for Leave to Amend. Plaintiff Robert McCormack may file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days of this Order, consistent with the instructions contained herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb) (Main Document 30 replaced on 2/26/2013, NEF has been regenerated) (krb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
