Joyner v. Christon et al
| Miguel Charles Joyner |
| B. Christon, Terrie Rosenthal, Clinton E. Blake, Jesse Hall, Melodee Armfield, Randy Blades and Idaho Department of Corrections |
| 1:2015cv00472 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Ronald E. Bush |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiffs motion, captioned as a Motion Requesting Leave of the Court to File Objecting to Judge Winmills Unauthorized Presiding in Plaintiffs Tort Claim and to Reconsider Dismissal of Plaintiff s Tort Action (Dkt. 37 ), is DENIED.(2) Plaintiffs identical motion (filed at Dkt. 38 ) is DEEMED MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery (Dkt. 31 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's "Motion for and or Stipulation for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)" (Dkt. 32 ) is DEEMED MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
