Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miguel Joyner v. Randy Blade
as 18-71145
Petitioner:
MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER
Respondent:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Albert Veenstra, III, et al v. Idaho State Board of Correctio, et al
as 17-35952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER and WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, DEBBIE FIELD, Appointed member of teh ISBC sued in her official capacity and others
Albert Veenstra, III, et al v. USDC-IDB
as 17-71575
:
In re: ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER, JEFFREY BOYD ASH and others
Petitioner:
ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER, JEFFREY BOYD ASH and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, DEBBIE FIELD, Appointed member of teh ISBC sued in her official capacity and others
Joyner v. IDOC
as 1:2015cv00489
Petitioner:
Miguel Charles Joyner
Respondent:
IDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joyner v. Christon et al
as 1:2015cv00472
Plaintiff:
Miguel Charles Joyner
Defendant:
B. Christon, Terrie Rosenthal, Clinton E. Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veenstra et al v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Miguel Charles Joyner, Jeffrey Boyd Ash and others
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Idaho Department of Correction, Debbie Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner et al v. Christon et al
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Miguel Charles Joyner and Melodee Armfield
Defendant:
B Christon, Terrie Rosenthal, Clinton E Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
