Nelson v. Tewalt et al
| Gregory Joseph Nelson |
| R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley, Eugene Clark, Lombardi, McArthur, Yordy, Baroso, CO Martin, Blanchard, Henry Attencio, Josh Tewalt, Dutter, Case, Shaber, Alberto Ramirez and Seely |
| 1:2019cv00250 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Amended Complaint due by 9/10/2019. (alw) |
Filing 4
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Plaintiff must file any second amended complaint, as described above, within 28 days after entry of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with a copy of GeneralOrder 342. Any second amended complaint must comply with SubsectionA of that General Order. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF SEVERANCE. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Gregory Joseph Nelson. (jp) (originally was dkt 11 in case 1:19-cv-107-DCN. See Order) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
