Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
| Cody Willard |
| Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen, Warden Richardson, Mark Kubinski and Rachael Altig |
| 1:2023cv00236 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cody Willard. (Attachments: #1 eFile Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter)(jd) |
| Filing 5 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cody Willard. (jd) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cody Willard. Responses due by 6/6/2023. (jd) |
Filing 3
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF SEVERANCE OF CLAIMS INTO NEW ACTION - from related case 21-cv-409-BLW. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Josh Tewalt, filed by Cody Willard.(hs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
