Maddox et al v. City of Sandpoint et al
| Dana Maddox, D. M., Raymond Foster and H. F. |
| City of Sandpoint, City of Sandpoint Police Department, Skylar Carl Ziegler, Michael Henry Valenzuela, Corey Coon, John or Jane Doe #1-10 and Shane Riley |
| 2:2016cv00162 |
| April 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA - Northern Office |
| Bonner - Northern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER re 120 Motion in Limine, 123 Motion in Limine and 124 Motion in Limine. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions in Limine (Dkts. 120 , 124 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 123 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing
100
AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 39 Case Management Order - Dispositive Motions due by 1/25/2019. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 3/7/2019 02:30 PM (PST) in Coeur d Alene - District Courtroom before Judge B. Lynn Winmill (Decision to be issued b y 4/8/2019). Non-Expert Discovery due by 3/1/2019. Jury Trial set for 8/5/2019 01:30 PM (PST) in Coeur d Alene - District Courtroom before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 7/18/2019 11:00 AM (MST) in Boise Chambers before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs) (Main Document 100 replaced on 9/24/2018 to include Judge's signature on Order. NEF regenerated.) (cjs).
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of qualified immunity for Officers Ziegler and Valenzuela (Dkt. 55 ) is DENIED. 2. Within 10 days after entry of this order, the parties are ordere d to submit a stipulation as to new expert disclosure deadlines. 3. Per the Stipulation Re: Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56 ), Defendants may contact the Court to schedule deadlines for hearing on the remaining portions of their motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER REGARDING PHASED DISCOVERY re 44 Stipulation. Defendants to file their motions related to the qualified immunity issue by 12/16/2016. Plaintiffs to respond by 1/13/2017 (Case Management deadline set for 12/16/2016). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
39
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Standard Track) - Proposed Agreement on phased discovery timeline due by 9/27/2016. ADR Plan to be filed by 12/7/2016. Amended Pleadings and Joinder of Partiesdue by 11/7/2016. Discovery due by 4/28/2017. Dispositive Motions d ue by 5/29/2017. The parties have filed a stipulated Discovery Plan (Dkt. 36 ) that the Court incorporates by reference herein and APPROVES as an Order of the Court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
