Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Shane Riley, et al v. City of Sandpoint, et al
as 19-35776
Plaintiff:
H.F., DANA MADDOX, on behalf of D.M. and D.M., minor children and heirs of Jeanetta Riley, deceased, D.M. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HENRY VALENZUELA, in his individual and official capacity, COREY COON, in his individual and official capacity, SKYLAR CARL ZIEGLER, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
BONNER COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL and ROSEMARY BRINKEMEIER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE RILEY, an individual, and as Personal Representative, heir and husband to the deceased Jeanetta Riley, and on behalf of their unborn child
Riley et al v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00904
Plaintiff:
Patty Ann Riley and Shane Riley
Defendant:
The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dana Maddox, et al v. City of Sandpoint, et al
as 17-35875
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANA MADDOX, on behalf of D.M. and D.M., minor children and heirs of Jeanetta Riley, deceased, D.M., D.M. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SANDPOINT, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, CITY OF SANDPOINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department of the City of Sandpoint, SKYLAR CARL ZIEGLER, in his individual and official capacity and others
Riley v. City of Sandpoint et al
as 2:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Shane Riley
Defendant:
City of Sandpoint, City of Sandpoint Police Department, Michael Henry Valenzuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox et al v. City of Sandpoint et al
as 2:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Dana Maddox , D. M. , Raymond Foster and others
Defendant:
City of Sandpoint , City of Sandpoint Police Department , Skylar Carl Ziegler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
