Idaho Rivers United et al v. Hudson et al
Idaho Rivers United, Morgan Wright and Olga Wright |
Joe Hudson and United States Forest Service |
Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners and Idaho Department of Lands |
3:2015cv00169 |
May 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Moscow - Central Office |
Idaho - Central |
B. Lynn Winmill |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM DECISION. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for injunctive relief (docket no. 7 ) is GRANTED. The State Defendant-Intervenors are hereby enjoined from using Forest Road 652 for any purpose connected to the timb er salvage sale. The Forest Service and District Ranger Joe Hudson are hereby enjoined from granting any permission to the State to use Forest Road 652 for any purpose connected to the timber salvage sale. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the parties shal l contact the Courts Law ClerkDave Metcalf to establish an expedited schedule for resolution of this case. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.