Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Save the South Fork Salmon et al v. U.S. Forest Service
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Save the South Fork Salmon and Idaho Rivers United
Defendant: U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Idaho Conservation League, et al. v. Bonneville Power Administration
as 24-1653
Petitioner: IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS and IDAHO RIVERS UNITED
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Idaho Conservation League, et al. v. Bonneville Power Administration
as 23-593
Petitioner: IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS and IDAHO RIVERS UNITED
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor: PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL INC, NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES and ALLIANCE OF WESTERN ENERGY CONSUMERS
Idaho Conservation League, et al v. BPA
as 22-70122
Petitioner: IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS and IDAHO RIVERS UNITED
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
In re: American Rivers, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-16961
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant: Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Columbia Riverkeeper, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 19-35033
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellant: PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, IDAHO RIVERS UNITED, THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 18-35152
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: NORTHWEST RIVER PARTNERS
Intervenor-Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?