Jenkins, et al. v. Semrad, et al.
Kim Jenkins and Lou Ann Thomas |
Avis K. Semrad, Benjamin J. Young, William Addington and Charles Newhouse |
4:2023cv00356 |
August 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. #5 ) AND TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR DISCOVERY AND LITIGATION PLANS - the Motion (Dkt. #6 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #5 ) shall be filed on or before October 25, 2023. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference currently set for September 28, 2023, is VACATED. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 10/25/2023. (jd) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Michele Anderson-West appearing for Plaintiffs Kim Jenkins, Lou Ann Thomas. Responses due by 10/11/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Anderson-West, Michele) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Peter L Wucetich appearing for Defendants William Addington, Charles Newhouse, Avis K. Semrad, Benjamin J. Young. Responses due by 9/5/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(Wucetich, Peter) |
Filing 4 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - On or before September 21, 2023, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 9/28/2023 02:00 PM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge B Lynn Winmill. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for William Addington, Charles Newhouse, Avis K. Semrad, Benjamin J. Young, Lou Ann Thomas, and Kim Jenkins re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/10/2023. (jd) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Number Change: Case was opened with incorrect division. Corrected to Eastern Division. Please use case number 4:23-cv-00356-BLW for all future filings. (jd) |
RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - All Defendants. (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (jd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Benjamin J. Young, Charles Newhouse, William Addington, Avis K. Semrad from District Court of the 7th Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Oneida, case number cv36-23-0078., filed by Benjamin J. Young, Charles Newhouse, William Addington, Avis K. Semrad. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 State Court Service Documents, #8 State Court Service Documents, #9 State Court Service Documents, #10 State Court Register of Actions)(Wucetich, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.