Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Warren County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Defendant:
Bill Jenkins, A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Warren County, Kentucky, William D. Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Actions re: rights of Tennessee Valley Authority
Jenkins, et al. v. Semrad, et al.
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Kim Jenkins and Lou Ann Thomas
Defendant:
Avis K. Semrad, Benjamin J. Young, William Addington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Jenkins et al v. Office Depot, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Kim Jenkins and Wayne Jenkins
Defendant:
Office Depot, LLC and The ODP Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michelle Agee, et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc., et al
as 17-3296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE AGEE, GAYLE BACHMANN, NICHOLAS BATTISTA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a California Corporation and PARCELL LABORATORIES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Agee et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00750
Defendant:
Alphatec Spine, Inc. and Parcell Laboratories, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Agee , Gayle Bachman , Nick Battista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Kim Brandveen
as 15-6690
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KIM JENKINS BRANDVEEN
Brandveen v. USA
as 3:2013cv00258
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kim Jenkins Brandveen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Kim Brandveen
as 12-6185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KIM JENKINS BRANDVEEN
US v. Kim Brandveen
as 12-4031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KIM JENKINS BRANDVEEN
US v. Kim Brandveen
as 12-4014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KIM JENKINS BRANDVEEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
