Azzeh v. Dart et al
| Shareef Azzeh |
| Tom Dart, John #1 Doe and John #2 Doe |
| 1:2012cv07013 |
| August 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Warren |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 10/10/2012: The Court grants Plaintiffs motion for leave to file in forma pauperis [ 3 ], and assesses an initial filing fee of $6.70. The Court authorizes trust fund accou nt officials at Plaintiff's place of confinement to deduct the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account and to continue making deductions in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust f und office at the Shawnee Correctional Center. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff submitting an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. The clerk is directed to send to Plaintiff an amended c ivil rights complaint form, along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel [ 4 ] is denied without prejudice. (For further details see Written Opinion). Mailed notice. (et, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
