Matthews v. Reinhardt et al
| Nathan Matthews |
| Jenna Reinhardt, Walker, Kim Foxx, Prokopiuk, James Konstanto Poulos and Service List |
| 1:2023cv04486 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (lma, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff has submitted two motions to dismiss #5 , #6 , #7 (duplicate), that the Court construes as notices of voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) (stating that, generally, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment..."); Smith v. Potter, 513 F.3d 781, 78283 (7th Cir. 2008) (finding that motion that was "[i]n substance" a Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "effected dismissal of the suit"); Scam Instrument Corp. v. Control Data Corp., 458 F.2d 885, 888 (7th Cir. 1972) (voluntarily dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) [now Rule 41(a)(1)(A)] automatically terminates the action upon filing). The motions #5 , #6 , #7 are granted. Summonses have not issued, and no Defendants have appeared or answered. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions #3 are terminated. When Plaintiff filed suit, he incurred an irrevocable obligation to pay the fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 433 (7th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 8/7/2023. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews to withdraw/motion to dismiss case from docket (Envelope postmarked 7/26/2023) (jg, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews to withdraw/dismiss case from docket. (Envelope post marked 7/25/2023) (rp, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews to withdraw/to dismiss the case. (Envelope postmarked 7/20/2023). (jj, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction regarding #1 (kl, ) |
| MAILED Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Nathan Matthews (kl, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachment) (kl, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Nathan Matthews (Attachments) (Envelope not postmarked) (kl, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/13/2023) (kl, ). Modified on 7/13/2023 (kl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
