Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Anthony Milner v. Officer Antesberger, et al
as 22-2611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MILNER
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER ANTESBERGER, HUERTAS, Officer, KIM FOXX and others
Meacham v. University Of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv04961
Plaintiff:
Rose Meachum and Rose Meacham
Defendant:
University Of Illinois, State of Illinois, Illinois State Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Selyutin v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv04621
Petitioner:
Aleksandr Selyutin
Respondent:
State of Illinois and Kim Foxx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Foxx et al
as 1:2022cv04223
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Foxx, Michael Deno, Deborah Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaglicic v. Foxx et al
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Eric Jaglicic
Defendant:
Kim Foxx, Kwame Raoul, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Garner v. City of Chicago
as 1:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Debtor In Possession:
Kim Foxx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ware v. Cook County et al
as 1:2022cv02336
Plaintiff:
Latoya Ware
Defendant:
Cook County, Unknown Employees, State's Attorne Kim Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bill James v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILL JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIM FOXX
Felipe Gomez v. Jussie Smollett, et al
as 22-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSSIE SMOLLETT, OLABINJO OSUNDARIO, ABIMBOLA OSUNDARIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
