White v. Gerardot
| 1:2005cv00382 |
| November 1, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
253
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 172 MOTION in Limine Evidence of Prior or Subsequent Claims; The Police Officers Disciplinary Records; Citizen Complaints, Other Excessive Force or Deadly Force Lawsuits, or any Other Claims or Lawsuits; Evidence Regarding the Post-Shooting Investigation; Testimony from Witnesses for whom Plaintiff has not Provided an Address or Full Name; Evidence of Attorney's Fees; References to Settlement Negotiations; The Denial of Officer Gerard ot's Motion for Summary Judgment; References as to Whether the City of Fort Wayne will be Paying for any Judgment against Officer Mark Gerardot; Any Testimony that Officer Mark Gerardot Allegedly had a Vendetta against Derrick Ford or had Prior Run-ins with Derrick Ford; Any Mention of Other Police Liability Cases in Which the Defense Experts have Testified Other than for Impeachment of a Prior Inconsistent Statement; Any Testimony that Derrick Ford Allegedly did not have a Gun in his Posse ssion on January 9th or January 10th, 2004; The fact that Officer Gerardot Applied to and was not Accepted to Certain Police Departments Years Prior to the Subject Shooting; and Rumors that Officer Gerardot is Prejudiced, that he Harasses People, tha t he has been Involved in Other Shootings, and that Derrick Ford did not like Officer Gerardot by Defendant Mark Gerardot. It is ORDERED that counsel, those acting on behalf of the parties, and any witnesses shall not refer to the matters excluded pursuant to and as outlined in this Order. Counsel are further ORDERED to warn and caution each and every one of their witnesses to strictly follows these instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/24/08. (cer)
|
|
Filing
158
OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING 154 OBJECTION to the Court's Preliminary Instructions by Defendant Mark Gerardot. The Preliminary Jury Instructions will be modified in accordance with the terms in this Order; OVERRULING 155 OBJECTION to the Court's Preliminary Instructions by Arlinthia White. The revised Preliminary Instructions will be filed on the record forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/29/08. (cer)
|
|
Filing
157
OPINION AND ORDER re 123 MOTION to Exclude Opinions of Kenneth Katsaris and Werner Spitz, M.D. filed by Mark Gerardot. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART with respect to Kenneth Katsaris according to the terms set forth in this Opinion and Order and is DENIED with respect to Werner Spitz MD. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/23/08. (cer)
|
|
Filing
153
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 125 RULE 12(f) MOTION to Strike Nitin Paranjpe, Ph.D. by Defendant Mark Gerardot; GRANTING 130 RULE 12(f) MOTION (Supplemental) to Strike Nitin Paranjpe, Ph.D. by Defendant Mark Gerardot.Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/10/08. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. Gerardot | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
