Brown et al v. Walker
1:2006cv00218 |
May 30, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
Roger B Cosbey |
Theresa L Springmann |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 182 ORDER modifying and adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 181 Report and Recommendations; granting 167 Amended Motion for Default Judgment; clerk directed to enter an amended judgment in favor of pltfs and agnst deft in accordance with order. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 6/9/10. (lrm) |
Filing 176 OPINION AND ORDER TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT 167 Motion to Amend 165 Opinion and Order by Plas J C Brown, Spirit of America Corporation, Amaze-N-Tow LLC and referring case to Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey for purposes of conducting proceedings, including a damages hearing, and submitting proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Plas' Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/24/2010. (lns) |
Filing 165 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 155 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Sanctions against Defendant filed by Plas; GRANTING 129 Amended MOTION for Default Judgment as to Sanctions filed by Plas, DENYING 161 MOTION to Reinstate Counterclaim for Rackete ering filed by Dft; DENYING as MOOT: 120 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant filed by Plas, 126 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Plas, 124 MOTION to Strike Response to Motion filed by Plas, 134 MOTION in Limine filed by Plas, 138 MOT ION in Limine filed by Dft, 144 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum filed by Plas, 147 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant filed by Plas, 148 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plas JC Brown, Spirit of America Corporation and Amaze-N-Tow and against Dft Esler C Walker. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 9/30/2009. (lns) |
Filing 119 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 110 MOTION to Vacate 104 Opinion and Order by Defendant Esler C Walker; DENYING 111 MOTION to Vacate 104 Opinion and Order (denial of Esler C Walker Jr's mandatory judicial notices) by Defendant Esler C Walker. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/3/09. (cer) |
Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 72 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant for Failure to Appear at Mediation, and dft is ORDERED to pay pltfs sanctions of $2780.21 for fees and costs incurred by 11/24/08. The dft's Notice Under Authority of F. R.E.R. 201(d) 79 is DENIED. The dft's Second Notice Under Authority of F.R.E.R. 201(d) 84 is DENIED. The pltfs' Motion to Strike Dft's Second Notice to Court 85 is DENIED AS MOOT. The pltfs' Motion to Strike Dft's Motio n for Summary Judgment 99 and pltfs' Motion to Strike Dft's Exhibits in Support of his Motion for Summary Judgment 101 are GRANTED. Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment 87 is STRICKEN. The Court will set a phone conference and reset pretrial and trial dates by separate order. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/31/08. (jcp) |
Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING 14 Motion to Set Aside Judgment by Esler C Walker, DISMISSING 18 Motion to Find Deft in Contempt by JC Brown, Spirit of America Corporation, Amaze-N-Tow LLC. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/1/2006. (lns) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown et al v. Walker | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.