Miller v. Fort Wayne Police Department et al
| Nathaniel D Miller |
| Fort Wayne Police Department, Brian Martin, Kimberly Seiss and Teresa Smith |
| 1:2007cv00163 |
| July 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 97 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Nathaniel D Miller, and certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. The Clerk is directed to provide notice as required by FRAP 24(a)(4). The pltf has 30 days from the date of receiving such notice in which to ask the Court of Appeals to allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 3/10/10. (jcp)
|
|
Filing
91
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING [52,65] Motions for Summary Judgment; DENYING [58,69] Motions in Limine; and DENYING AS MOOT 88 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/25/10. (jcp)
|
|
Filing
82
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 75 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Nathaniel D Miller. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/10/09. (jcp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
