Dennis v. Potter et al
| Carolyn S Dennis |
| John E Potter and United States Postal Service |
| 1:2008cv00198 |
| August 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Postal Service, DENYING 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment In Opposition filed by Carolyn S Dennis, GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART and DENYING IN PART AS MOOT 75 RULE 12(f) MOTION to Strike 73 Memorandum in Opposition filed by John E Potter, United States Postal Service. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and against Pla. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 3/23/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING without prejudice 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by United States Postal Service; DENYING without prejudice 31 Alternative Motion to Amend Complaint by Carolyn S Dennis. Pla GRANTED to/incl 3/31/2010 in which to file a motio n for leave to amend complaint to clarify her cause of action. Pla must submit her proposed Amended Complaint with her motion. LR 7.1(a) governs the time periods for filing a response and reply. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 3/15/2010. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
