Martin v. York et al
| Anthony C Martin |
| Rusty York, Daniel Royse, Richard Jennings, David Tinsley, Timothy Hughes, Michael McEachern and Fort Wayne Police Department |
| 1:2008cv00246 |
| October 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Allen |
| James T Moody |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 93 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/22/10. (jcp)
|
|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 82 MOTION for New Trial; Altering or Amending Judgment by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/11/10. (cer)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER DEEMING MOOT 40 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike by Defendants; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants. The Motion is DENIED concerning Plaintiff Anthony Martins claim of physical restraint and prolonged detention against Fort Wayne police Officers Daniel Royse, Richard Jennings, David Tinsley, Timothy Hughes, and Michael McEachern in their individual capacity. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 3/2/10. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
