Burkholder et al v. Fort Wayne City of
| Jeffery Burkholder, Sr, Martin Grooms and Sofia Rosales |
| Fort Wayne City of |
| 1:2008cv00273 |
| November 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Report and Recommendations. The Court GRANTS 70 MOTION (Amended) for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to Rule 54(d) by Plaintiff Jeffery Burkholder, Sr, 71 MOTION (Joint) for Addition of New Plai ntiffs, Final Class Certification and Approval of Settlement by Defendant Fort Wayne City of. Upon filing of appropriate consent forms the additional individuals, George Niklow, Kimberly Seiss, Chad Squires and Cary Young, will be Opt-In Plaintiffs i n the case. Solely for settlement purposes, this action is CERTIFIED as a collective action under 29:216(b). The parties' Settlement Agreement (DE 71 ) is APPROVED. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees in the sum of $78,000.00 to be paid pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 11/1/10. (cer)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Approval of the Agreed Stipulation and Order Concerning Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 2/24/09. (jcp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
