Shoppell v. Schrader et al
Defendant: Michael D Schrader, Whitley County Sheriff's Department The, Wendell Enyeart and Whitley County Board of Commissioners
Estate Plaintiff: Leanne C Shoppell
Case Number: 1:2008cv00284
Filed: November 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Whitley
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION AND ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 9/22/10. (lrm)
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 47 Motion to Compel by Dft Whitley County Council. The motion can be renewed if necessary after cnsl conduct a conf or the Dft properly shows that a conf was attempted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 8/13/2009. (lns)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 40 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Whitley County Council. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/30/2009. (lns)
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING both the Commissioners' 33 Motion to Enter Final Judgment and their amended 34 motion. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/1/09. (sda)
March 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Whitley County Board of Commissioners; claims against Whitley County Board of Commissioners are DISMISSED and pltf is granted 30 days to amend her complaint to include Whitley County Council as outlined. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/2/09. (jcp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shoppell v. Schrader et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Estate plaintiff: Leanne C Shoppell
Represented By: Ralph E Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael D Schrader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitley County Sheriff's Department The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendell Enyeart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitley County Board of Commissioners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?