Shadle v. First Financial Bank NA
Plaintiff: Rex A Shadle
Defendant: First Financial Bank NA
Case Number: 1:2009cv00037
Filed: February 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Consumer Credit Office
County: Blackford
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 22 Motion to Compel and Request to Extend the Discovery Deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/10/09. (jcp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shadle v. First Financial Bank NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rex A Shadle
Represented By: Austin A Shadle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Financial Bank NA
Represented By: Joseph R Fullenkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?