Shadle v. First Financial Bank NA
Rex A Shadle |
First Financial Bank NA |
1:2009cv00037 |
February 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Consumer Credit Office |
Blackford |
Roger B Cosbey |
Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 22 Motion to Compel and Request to Extend the Discovery Deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/10/09. (jcp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shadle v. First Financial Bank NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rex A Shadle | |
Represented By: | Austin A Shadle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: First Financial Bank NA | |
Represented By: | Joseph R Fullenkamp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.