JD Factors LLC v. Freightco LLC
Plaintiff: JD Factors LLC
Defendant: Freightco LLC
Case Number: 1:2009cv00095
Filed: April 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Robert L Miller
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 100 Motion for Costs as Prevailing Party, for Prejudgment Interest and For An Award of Attorney's Fees filed by JD Factors LLC. The Motion is granted in that Dft owes Pla prejudgment interest in the amount of $17,127.83, and its costs of suit, pending Pla's submission of a Bill of Costs. Pla's Motion is otherwise DENIED. Pursuant to the Court's Opinion and Order dated 7/28/10, Dft also owes Pla $95,857.14. Clerk directed to enter judgment in the amount of $112,984.97, plus costs, in favor of Pla and against Dft. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/25/2010. (lns)
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 96 OPINION AND ORDER; Plaintiffs and Defendants motions for summary judgment(Docket # 58, 66) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART in that, as a matter of law, Defendant owes Plaintiff $119,226.95, less Defendants setoff of $23,369.81 ( the remaining uncollected ledger balance of the amount owed to FreightCo by BBX). Plaintiffs motions to strike (Docket # 74, 88), Defendants motions to strike (Docket # 70, 94), and Defendants motion in limine (Docket # 67) are all DENIED AS MOOT. De fendants requests for oral argument (Docket # 63, 77) are also DENIED. Telephone conference SET for 8/20/10 at 1:00 P.M. Fort Wayne time, to schedule what remains of case. The Court will initiate the call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/28/10. (jcp)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant is ORDERED to supplement or clarify the record by 10/26/09 concerning the citizenship of each of its members at the time of filing plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/16/09. (jcp)
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Rule 12(b)(1) Fed.R.Civ.P.) filed by Freightco LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 8/13/09. (jcp)
April 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER re jurisdiction; plaintiff to file Amended Complaint forthwith, properly alleging the citizenship of each party and tracing the citizenship of all unincorporated associations as outlined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/17/09. (jcp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JD Factors LLC v. Freightco LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JD Factors LLC
Represented By: Martin E Seifert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freightco LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?