Hartford The v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Hartford The
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation and Millar Elevator Service Co
Case Number: 1:2009cv00132
Filed: May 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 41 MOTION (First) for Summary Judgment Or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation; DENYING AS MOOT 60 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 57 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 1/31/12. (cer)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 52 MOTION for Leave to File a Response to Defendants' Pending Motions by Plaintiff Hartford The; DEEMING MOOT 60 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 57 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation. On its own motion, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE 57 RESPONSE to Motion re 41 Motion (First) for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss filed by Hartford The. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/1/11. (cer)
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 26 MOTION to Compel filed by Hartford The. Further discovery in case is STAYED until further order. Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/11/2011 at 09:00 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey. The Court will initiate the call and will inquire concerning when mediation is scheduled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/29/10. (cer)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING 7 OBJECTION (deemed by the Court to be a Motion to Remand) filed by Plaintiff Hartford The. Plaintiff's request for a remand is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 10/6/09. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hartford The v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Represented By: Edward L Murphy, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Millar Elevator Service Co
Represented By: Edward L Murphy, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hartford The
Represented By: Howard Howe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?