Simon v. Muschell et al
| James A Simon |
| Special Agent Paul Muschell, Alvin Patton, Special Agent Linda Porter, Unknown Agents and Unknown Individuals |
| Denise J Simon |
| 1:2009cv00301 |
| October 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| James T Moody |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 71 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendants Special Agent Paul Muschell, Alvin Patton, Special Agent Linda Porter. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/13/2017. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00301-WCL-APR, 1:10-cv-00058-WCL-APR(lhc)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 47 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant United States of America. The Clerk is directed to dismiss the United States as a party in this case. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 2/24/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 27 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Defendants Special Agent Paul Muschell, Alvin Patton, Special Agent Linda Porter; GRANTING 34 MOTION to Stay, MOTION for Protective Order by Defendants Special Agent Paul Muschell, Alvin Patton, Special Agent Linda Porter. Case No. 1:10-CV-58 consolidated with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/4/10. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
