Kruse Inc v. Hogan et al
Plaintiff: Kruse Inc
Defendant: Playtime Playground Equipment and Rodney Hogan
Case Number: 1:2010cv00014
Filed: January 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 107 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Rodney Hogan, Playtime Playground Equipment, Counter Claimant Rodney Hogan. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/22/15. (cer)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 89 MOTION For Relief from Judgment by Plaintiff Kruse Inc. The Court will now set this matter for status conference to determine whether any party desires to file a dispositive motion. Otherwise, this matter will be set for trial. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/28/2014. (lhc)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 82 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 81 Order by ThirdParty Defendant Dean V Kruse. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/27/13. (lhc)
August 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 55 Joint MOTION to Compel filed by Rodney Hogan. Signed by Judge Roger B. Cosbey on 8/24/2011. (kjm)
July 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 48 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by ThirdParty Defendant Dean V Kruse, Plaintiff Kruse Inc, Counter Defendant Kruse Inc; GRANTING 49 MOTION to Continue by Defendant Rodney Hogan. Status Conference set for 8/1/2011 is VACATED and RESET to 8/4/2011 at 04:30 PM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey. Counsel are to be present IN PERSON. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/29/11. (cer)
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER re 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Rodney Hogan, Playtime Playground Equipment. Defendants ORDERED to file an amended Notice of Removal forthwith properly alleging on personal knowledge the citizenship of Plaintiff Kruse Inc and Defendant Playtine Playground Equipment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/21/10. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kruse Inc v. Hogan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Playtime Playground Equipment
Represented By: James P Buchholz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Hogan
Represented By: James P Buchholz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kruse Inc
Represented By: John R Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?