Wells et al v. EMF Corp
| Rick Wells, Judy Humes and Vern Smith |
| EMF Corp |
| 1:2010cv00070 |
| March 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| James T Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 55 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 49 Response to Motion by Defendant EMF Corp; GRANTING 46 MOTION (Second) for Summary Judgment by Defendant EMF Corp. Clerk DIRECTED to enter final judgment in favor of Defendant EMF Corp and against Plaintiffs Rick Wells, Judy Humes and Vern Smith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/3/11. (cer)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by EMF Corp with respect to Plas Rick Wells and Vern Smith but DENYING motion as to Pla Judy Humes. Dft GRANTED leave to file second motion for summary judgment with respect to Humes&# 039;s claim on/bf 3/11/11; GRANTING 28 MOTION to Strike Plas' Untimely Response; DENYING 33 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike Attachments filed by Judy Humes, Vern Smith, Rick Wells, DENYING 32 MOTION to Amend Response Brief filed by Judy Humes, Vern Smith, Rick Wells, GRANTING 35 MOTION to Amend Admissions filed by Judy Humes, Vern Smith, Rick Wells. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/1/2010. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
