Romary Associates Inc v. Kibbi LLC et al
Plaintiff: Romary Associates Inc
Defendant: Kibbi LLC, McKibbin Enterprises Inc and Kibbi Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2010cv00376
Filed: October 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 64 MOTION to Amend/Correct Protective Order by Plaintiff Romary Associates Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/6/12. (cer)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 57 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Defendant Kibbi LLC. The amount of the requested fee of $5,524.25 will be reduced to $2,818.38. Romary shall pay Renegade's attorney fees in the amount of $2,818.38 for the expenses incurred in filing its Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/18/11. (cer)
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING AS MOOT IN PART 48 MOTION to Compel by Defendant and Counterclaimant Kibbi LLC. The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT IN PART subject to Defendant Renegade filing a subsequent motion to compel after another Loc al Rule 37.1 conference and is GRANTED IN PART as to attorney's fees. Renegade's counsel is GRANTED until 9/19/2011 to file a petition for attorney's fees and supporting affidavit as outlined in Order. The petition is to brief out in accordance with Local Rule 7.1(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/8/11. (cer)
July 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 44 Report and Recommendations. The 33 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant Kibbi LLC is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Count II of Plaintiff Romary Associates Inc's Complaint. The rest of Plaintiff's claims remain pending as pled. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/12/11. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romary Associates Inc v. Kibbi LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Romary Associates Inc
Represented By: Jeremy N Gayed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kibbi LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKibbin Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kibbi Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?