Tasby v. Heimlick et al
Plaintiff: Cartier D Tasby
Defendant: Darryl Heimlick, Randy Albertson, Cathy Lee and Billy Kirkpatrick
Case Number: 1:2010cv00419
Filed: November 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 142 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 117 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Randy Albertson, Darryl Heimlick, Billy Kirkpatrick, Cathy Lee; GRANTING 136 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 132 Response to Motion (Submissions of Plaintiff on Summary Judgment) by Defendants Randy Albertson, Darryl Heimlick, Billy Kirkpatrick, Cathy Lee. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Darryl Heimlick, Randy Albertson, Cathy Lee and Billy Kirkpatrick and against Plaintiff Cartier Tasby, who shall take nothing by way of his Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 2/19/13. (cer)
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 102 MOTION to Compel filed by Cartier D Tasby. Defendants ORDERED to either produce and file the four incomplete grievances in full or to execute an affidavit from the Sheriff or records custodian as outlined in Order. Defendants to file the grievances or the affidavit by 3/21/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 3/6/12. (cer)
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is free to attempt to secure counsel on his own. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/22/11. (jcp)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 34 MOTION to Amend 1 Pro Se Complaint by Plaintiff Cartier D Tasby. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 5/23/11. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tasby v. Heimlick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cartier D Tasby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl Heimlick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Albertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cathy Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Billy Kirkpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?