Ward v. Franciscy
| Kerwin M Ward |
| Joshua Franciscy |
| 1:2010cv00429 |
| December 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| William C Lee |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 41 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kerwin M Ward. The Plaintiff is DISCHARGED from making any further installment payments toward the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/11/11. (cer)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff Kerwin Ward AFFORDED until 7/11/2011 within which to pay the remainder of his filing fee or provide the Court with his Indiana Department of Correction prisoner trust account ledger statements as outlined in Order. Clerk DIRECTED to forward to Plaintiff a non-prisoner informa pauperis petition. Plaintiff CAUTIONED that failure to respond to this Order may result in this case being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/7/11. (cer). Modified on 6/7/2011. (cer)
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 17 MOTION for Default Judgment by Plaintiff Kerwin M Ward.Signed by Judge William C Lee on 5/4/11. (cer). Modified on 5/5/2011. (cer)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER re 11 PRO SE AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kerwin M Ward. Plaintiff GRANTED leave to proceed against Defendants for damages in their personal capacities for damages on the claim that Defendants used excessive and unnecessar y force when they arrested Plaintiff. Defendants ORDERED to respond to the Amended Complaint as provided for in the FRCP. US Marshal's Service DIRECTED to effect service of process on Defendants and Clerk DIRECTED to ensure that a copy of this Order, the Summons and the Complaint are served on Defendants. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/20/11. (cer)
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION AND ORDER re 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kerwin M Ward. Plaintiff GRANTED leave to proceed against Defendant Joshua Franciscy for damages in his personal capacity for damages on the claim that Defendant used excessive and unnecess ary force when he arrested Plaintiff. Defendant ORDERED to respond to the Complaint as provided for in the FRCP. US Marshal's Service DIRECTED to effect service of process on Defendant and Clerk DIRECTED to ensure that a copy of this Order, the Summons and the Complaint are served on him. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/26/11. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ward v. Franciscy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kerwin M Ward | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joshua Franciscy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
