Dennis v. Potter et al
Plaintiff: Carolyn S Dennis
Defendant: John E Potter and United States Postal Service
Case Number: 1:2011cv00058
Filed: February 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING in its entirety 52 MOTION for Reconsideration re 50 Opinion and Order, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge by Dft United States Postal Service. The clerk is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT: Judgment is e ntered in favor of defendants the United States Postal Service and United States Postmaster General Megan Brennan, and against plaintiff Carolyn Dennis, who shall take nothing by way of her complaint. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/25/2015. (lhc)
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER Defendants the United States Postal Service and United States Postmaster General Megan Brennan have moved for reconsideration of their summary judgment motion, DE # 52 . The previously-imposed dates for the final pretrial conference and trial date are VACATED pending resolution of defendants motion for reconsideration. See DE # 50 . Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/5/15. (kjp)
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant United States Postal Service. The Court ORDERS this case be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins for the purpose of holding a Settlement Conf erence set for 8/13/2015 09:00 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. The parties are ordered to appear for Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/6/2015 09:00 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Senior Judge James T Moody. Finally, the parties are ordered to appear before the undersigned district court judge at the Hammond Division of the Northern District of Indiana on 11/30/2015 at 8:30 a.m., for trial in this matter. Absent exceptional circumstances, no continuances will be granted for the aforementioned dates. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/20/2015. (lhc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dennis v. Potter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn S Dennis
Represented By: Samuel L Bolinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E Potter
Represented By: Deborah M Leonard - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Represented By: Deborah M Leonard - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?