Blow v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Diane Blow |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2011cv00293 |
| August 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Robert L Miller |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 38 First MOTION for Attorney Fees Under 42 U.S.C Section 406(b) by Plaintiff Diane Blow, except that his requested fee of $9,148.25 is reduced to $4,898.55 to offset Shull's prior award of EAJA fees in t he amount of $4,249.70. The Commissioner is further ORDERED to deduct from Shull's award of $4,898.55 an amount equal to the interest on the remaining $4,249.70 owed to Blow, as calculated pursuant to the statutory interest rate, beginning March 25, 2014, through June 26, 2015, and add it to the $4,249.70 owed to Blow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 7/28/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with this Opinion and Order. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Diane Blow and against the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 8/6/12. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
