Martin v. Fort Wayne Police Dept et al
Plaintiff: Anthony C Martin
Defendant: Fort Wayne Police Dept, Officer #10671 and Officer #10628
Case Number: 1:2011cv00347
Filed: October 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 103 OPINION AND ORDER re 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Fort Wayne City of, Fort Wayne Police Dept, Tom Henry, Officer #10628, Officer #10671, Rusty York. The Motion is GRANTED as it relates to (1) Plaintiff's federal Section 1983 cl aims against all Defendants; (2) Plaintiff's state law claims against the unidentified officers; (3) Plaintiff's punitive damages claim against the City of Fort Wayne; and (4) Plaintiff's claims against the Fort Wayne Police Department . Plaintiff's state law claims against the City of Fort Wayne, Tom Henry, and Russell York are REMANDED back to state court. Clerk DIRECTED to dismiss the unidentified officers from this case. Clerk DIRECTED to return the case to the state court from which it originated. The 98 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike the Affidavit of Anthony Martin by Defendants Fort Wayne City of, Fort Wayne Police Dept, Tom Henry, Officer #10628, Officer #10671, Rusty York is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT. The 83 MOTION to Objection; Preserving A Claim Of Error Rule 51 Of The F.R.C.P by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin is DENIED. The 90 MOTION Federal Rules of Civil Proced. 60(a),(b) Mistake, Inadvertence, Newly Discovered Evidence, "Excus able Neglect", or Good Cause by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin is DENIED. The 95 RULE 12(f) MOTION to Strike 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/18/14. (cc: Certified Copy of Opinion and Order and Docket Sheet to Clerk, Allen Superior Court, Fort Wayne, IN). (cer). Modified on 3/18/2014. (cer)
December 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 76 MOTION to Strike Anthony Martin's First Request for Admissions and Third Request for Discovery to Defendants by Defendants Fort Wayne City of, Fort Wayne Police Dept, Tom Henry, Officer #10628, Officer #10671, Rusty York. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/17/12. (cer)
November 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 80 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 72 MOTION for Reconsideration (deemed by Court to be a Motion to Compel) by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/21/12. (cer)
October 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 70 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 69 MOTION for Reconsideration re 68 Opinion and Order filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/19/2012. (lns)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 67 MOTION to Amend 10 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/24/12. (cer)
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING defendants' 53 MOTION to Compel. Plaintiff to appear on 8/3/12 at 8:30 AM as outlined for deposition testimony. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel defendants' depositions 56 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/20/12. (jcp)
June 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 47 MOTION for Discovery (Motion to Compel) without prejudice filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/28/12. (jcp)
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING without prejudice 45 Request for Status Hearing and/or Emergency Joint Conference, which the Court deems to be a motion to preserve evidence or a motion to compel, filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/16/12. (jcp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Fort Wayne Police Dept et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony C Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fort Wayne Police Dept
Represented By: Carolyn M Trier
Represented By: Corinne K Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer #10671
Represented By: Corinne K Ross
Represented By: Carolyn M Trier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer #10628
Represented By: Corinne K Ross
Represented By: Carolyn M Trier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?