Parsh v. Technology Crops International

Defendant: Technology Crops International
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Parsh
Case Number: 1:2012cv00065
Filed: February 28, 2012
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Referring Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 1, 2012 6 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER; defendant is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended Notice of Removal on/bf 3/15/12 as outlined.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 3/1/12. (jcp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsh v. Technology Crops International
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Technology Crops International
Represented By: Andrew P Wirick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Parsh
Represented By: Samuel L Bolinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.