Finke v. Trustees of Purdue University et al
Plaintiff: Linda Finke
Defendant: William McKinney, Purdue University Trustees of, Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne and Michael Wartell
Case Number: 1:2012cv00124
Filed: April 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING AS MOOT IN PART 49 MOTION for Partial Dismissal Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) by Defendants Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne, William McKinney, Purdue University Trustees of, Michael Warte ll; GRANTING 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne, William McKinney, Purdue University Trustees of, Michael Wartell. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 6/30/14. (cer)
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER re 39 MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Linda Finke. The Motion is GRANTED in accordance with the terms set forth in this Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/7/13. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finke v. Trustees of Purdue University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William McKinney
Represented By: Lester H Cohen
Represented By: Shawn A Neal
Represented By: Scott E Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Purdue University Trustees of
Represented By: Scott E Shockley
Represented By: Shawn A Neal
Represented By: Lester H Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne
Represented By: Shawn A Neal
Represented By: Lester H Cohen
Represented By: Scott E Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Wartell
Represented By: Lester H Cohen
Represented By: Shawn A Neal
Represented By: Scott E Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Finke
Represented By: Linda A Polley
Represented By: Eric M Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?