United States of America v. Grace et al
United States of America |
Andrew J Grace, Kristine M Grace and Anthony Wayne Credit Adjuster |
1:2012cv00274 |
August 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
Wells |
Roger B Cosbey |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 17 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by United States of America. Judgment ORDERED against the Defendants in the amount of $150,944.84, plus interest at the rate of $18.51 per day from January 14, 2013 until May 14, 2013, in the amount of $2,239.71 for a total of $153,184.55. The Court hereby DECLARES the Plaintiff's Mortgage to be a valid, first and subsisting lien on the real estate described in this Opinion and Order. Court ORDERS the Mor tgage on the real estate foreclosed, BARS all of the Defendants Andrew and Kristine Grace's equity of redemption and interest in the real estate, and ORDERS the sale of the real estate pursuant to applicable law in order to pay the judgment of Plaintiff, with the proceeds of said sale to be first applied to the indebtedness of the Plaintiff secured by the Mortgage hereby foreclosed, and with any then-remaining surplus paid to the Clerk of the Court to be disposed of as the Court shall direct. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 5/14/13. (cer) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.