ZF Steering Systems LLC v. General Aluminum Mfg Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 2, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART AS MOOT 32 OBJECTION and Motion to Strike or Dismiss Busche's "Complaint" or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue of the Busche Complaint filed by Plaintiff ZF Steering Sy stems LLC; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART AS MOOT 47 OBJECTION and Motion to Strike or Dismiss Answer and Crossclaim filed by Plaintiff ZF Steering Systems LLC. The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff's request that the Court strike the filings b y the Defendant and by General Aluminum Mfg Company. The Court STRIKES the filing styled as a Complaint by Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant Busche Enterprise Division Inc (ECF No. 27 ) along with its attachments and STRIKES the filing styled as an Ame nded Answer to Busche Enterprise Division Inc and Crossclaim Against ZF Steering Systems LLC (ECF No. 40 ) along with its attachments. These documents are to remain a part of the record. Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's requests that the Court dismiss for improper venue or transfer the claims raised by the Defendant and by General Aluminum Mfg Company. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/21/2013 at 10:30 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Judge Theresa L Springmann. Court will intiate call. Court REMINDS the parties to continue to inform the Court of developments in the Michigan litigation. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 5/2/13. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?