Hartman v. Dana Holding Corporation et al
| Elaine Hartman |
| Dana Holding Corporation and Weatherhead-UAW Combined Hourly Employee Pension Plan |
| 1:2012cv00445 |
| December 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Philip P Simon |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER re 37 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Plaintiff Elaine Hartman. GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees, except that the fee award is reduced to $31,986.85. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/20/2013. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Elaine Hartman. The motion is granted as to Pla's statutory penalty claim, but denied as to her breach of fiduciary duty claims. Clerk DIRECTED to e nter judgment for the statutory penalty in the amount of $4,470 in favor of Pla and against Dfts. Dft's 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Weatherhead-UAW Combined Hourly Employee Pension Plan, Dana Holding Corporation is GRANTED as to the breach of fiduciary duty claims, but DENIED as to the statutory penalty claim. To the extent Pla is seeking attorney fees, she is to file a motion as outlined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/21/2013. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
