Martin v. Jones et al
| Nick J Martin |
| George Jones, Jones Auto and Richard England |
| 1:2013cv00016 |
| January 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| James T Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
195
OPINION AND ORDER: The Clerk DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Jones Defendants and England (see 175 ), and against Martin. Martin's motion to strike 193 is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 3/30/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
175
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 155 Motion for Summary Judgment; all of Martin's claims against defendant England are DISMISSED. The only claim remaining in this case is Martins claim against the Jones Defendants for unpaid wages for the period of April 22, 2012, through June 4, 2012, which is set for trial on March 21, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 2/27/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
|
|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 114 and 115 MOTIONS to RECONSIDER filed by Nick J Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 2/22/16. cc: pltf(kjp)
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 97 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Dfts Emma S Jones, George Jones, Trent Jones, Jones Auto, Jones Auto Repair. All of Martin's claims against Dfts George Jones, Jones Auto, Trent Jones, Emma S. Jones, and Jones Auto Repair are dismissed, with the exception of Martin's claim against these Dfts for unpaid wages for the period of April 22, 2012, through June 4, 2012, which survives. All of Martin's claims against Dft Richard England, which are presently stayed due to England's bankruptcy filing, remain. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 12/2/2015. (lhc) (cc: Pla)
|
|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER: This case is automatically STAYED with respect to Dft Richard England pending termination of his bankruptcy case. Counsel is ORDERED to file a notice with the Court when the bankruptcy case is complete. The Court sua sponte EXTE NDS the dispositive motion deadline to July 13, 2015.Plaintiffs two motions to compel 53 and 77 are each GRANTED IN PART andDENIED IN PART as set forth herein. Defendants George Jones, Jones Auto, Trent Jones, Emma S. Jones, and Jones Auto Repair are ORDERED to produce the outstanding discovery responses to Plaintiff and file them with the Court on or before June 30, 2015. Failure to comply with this Order by Defendants George Jones, Jones Auto, Trent Jones, Emma S. Jones, and Jones Auto Repair may result in sanctions under Rule 37(b)(2)(A), up to and including the entry of a default judgment against such Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 6/16/2015. (cc: Pla Martin)(rmn)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION AND ORDER re 15 MOTION to Amend 1 Pro Se Complaint by Plaintiff Nick J Martin. Plaintiff has until 4/18/2014 to file the proposed amended complaint on the court-suppplied form or the Motion to Amend will be denied. Plaintiff should be awa re that in the event he proceeds with amending his complaint to add a new claim, the Clerk's Entry of Default entered on May 30, 2013, may be vacated; the hearing set for May 19, 2014, cancelled; and his Motion for Default Judgment denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/3/14. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
