Rowlands v. United Parcel Service Fort Wayne
Plaintiff:
Linda Rowlands
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Fort Wayne
Case Number:
1:2013cv00059
Filed:
March 1, 2013
Court:
Indiana Northern District Court
Office:
Fort Wayne Office
County:
Allen
Referring Judge:
Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge:
Robert L Miller
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:
42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
October 5, 2017 | 70 |
![]() |
February 19, 2015 | 35 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rowlands v. United Parcel Service Fort Wayne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Linda Rowlands | |
Represented By: | Christopher C Myers |
Represented By: | Ilene M Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United Parcel Service Fort Wayne | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.