Chapel Ridge Investments LLC v. Petland Leaseholding Company Inc et al
Plaintiff: Chapel Ridge Investments LLC
Defendant: Petland Leaseholding Company Inc, The Unknown Officers Directors and Shareholders of Petland Leaseholding Company Inc and Petland Inc
Case Number: 1:2013cv00146
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 45 MOTION to Compel and to Extend Deadline to Take Plaintiff's 30 (b)(6) Deposition; GRANTING Attorney's fees in the amount of $2,535. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 3/25/2015. (lhc)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Petland Inc; GRANTING 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Plaintiff Chapel Ridge Investments LLC. Plaintiff ORDERED to file its corrected Amended Complaint. Defendant ORDERED to answer the Amended Complaint within 14 days after it is served on them. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 12/4/13. (cer)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER re 7 SECOND Amended Notice of Removal by Defendants Petland Inc, Petland Leaseholding Company Inc. Defendants ORDERED to file by 6/17/2013 a Second Amended Notice of Removal as outlined in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/3/13. (cer)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER re 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Petland Inc, Petland Leaseholding Company Inc. Defendants ORDERED to file by 5/22/2013 an Amended Notice of Removal as outlined in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 5/8/13. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapel Ridge Investments LLC v. Petland Leaseholding Company Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chapel Ridge Investments LLC
Represented By: C Erik Chickedantz
Represented By: Thomas M Gallmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petland Leaseholding Company Inc
Represented By: Jason M Kuchmay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Unknown Officers Directors and Shareholders of Petland Leaseholding Company Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petland Inc
Represented By: Jason M Kuchmay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?