Anderson v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
| Ralph Anderson, Jr. |
| Department of Veterans Affairs and Eric K Shinseki |
| 1:2014cv00129 |
| April 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING Defendants' 61 motion in limine to the extent that the Court will allow the jury to hear evidence regarding Anderson's alleged back pay and front pay damages. Defendants' 61 motion in limine is otherwis e GRANTED. Plaintiff Anderson's 58 motion in limine is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that counsel and those acting on behalf of the parties shall not refer to the matters excluded pursuant to this Opinion and Order. Counsel are further ORDERED to warn and caution each and every one of their witnesses to strictly follow these instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 1/18/18. (jld)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the VA's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Court SETS this case for a Telephonic Scheduling Conference for 4/14/2017 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 3/30/2017. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
