USI Insurance Services LLC v. Ryan et al
| USI Insurance Services LLC |
| WDCK LLC and John E Ryan |
| 1:2014cv00151 |
| May 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER re 77 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim Against USI and Third Party Complaint Against Wells Fargo by Defendant John E Ryan. GRANTING with respect to the affirmative defenses against USI, but otherwise DENYING, as outlined in Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/10/2014. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 25 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Defendant Ryan by Plaintiff USI Insurance Services LLC; DENYING AS MOOT 31 MOTION to Stay the Proceedings Pending the Court's Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Coun sel by Defendant John E Ryan; DEEMING MOOT 45 MOTION for Rule 16 Conference and Memorandum in Support by Defendant WDCK LLC. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2014 at 10:00 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey. The 40 MOTION for Extension of Deposition Deadline by Plaintiff USI Insurance Services LLC will be addressed at the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/7/14. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
