Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sandra K Moore |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2014cv00160 |
| May 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Jay |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 39 MOTION (First) for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 406(b) by Plaintiff Sandra K Moore. Attorney Shull's requested fee of $7,864.75 is reduced to $1,886.45 to offset his prior award of EAJA fe es in the amount $5,978.30. Commissioner of Social Security ORDERED to deduct from Attorney Shull's award of $1,886.45 an amount equal to the interest on the remaining $5,978.30 owed to Plaintiff, as calculated pursuant to the statutory interest rate, beginning January 31, 2017 through August 1, 2017, and add to it the $5,978.30 owed to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 8/21/17. (cer)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDING the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of Pla Sandra K Moore and against Dft Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 9/2/2015. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
