Myers v. Allen County Sheriff et al
| Jeffery D Myers |
| Allen County Sheriff, Officer FNU Dillon, FNU Goebles, Nurse Laura LNU and Nurse Stephanie LNU |
| 1:2015cv00002 |
| January 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Susan L Collins |
| James T Moody |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART both 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dfts Adam, Girardot, Hupp, Runyon and 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dfts Dillion, Gladieux, Goble, Runyon, Wiley; DENYING AS MOOT both 65 MOTI ON Strike portions of Affidavit of Jeffrey Myers by Dfts Adam, Girardot, Hupp, Runyon and 67 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 61 Response to Motion, Affidavit of Pla by Dfts Dillion, Gladieux, Goble, Runyon, Merissa Runyon, Wiley. The Clerk shall TERMINAT E all defendants with the exception of Nurse Hupp, Officer Wiley, and Officer Dillon. Because claims still remain in this case, the court withholds entry of final judgment. The parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report regarding their willingness to engage in a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge by 10/3/2017. A trial date will be set under separate order. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/19/2017. (lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
