Prime Insurance Company v. Riteway Trucking, Inc et al
Prime Insurance Company |
Riteway Trucking Inc, Decardo Humphrey and Darnell Wright |
1:2015cv00105 |
May 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan L Collins |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER re 20 MOTION for Service by Publication and a Determination as to Propriety of Service by Plaintiff Prime Insurance Company. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART in that Prime Insurance Company may serve Ali Faruq, Riteway Transportation and Deval Soneji by publication according to Rule 4.13 of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure; and that Prime Insurance Company's deadline to serve Ali Faruq, Riteway Transportation and Deval Soneji will be extended until 60 days from the date of this Opinion and Order. The Motion is DENIED IN PART regarding Prime Insurance Company's request that its efforts to serve Ali Faruq and Riteway Transportation by certified mail be deemed proper service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 5/10/16. (cer) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Complaint: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file on or before May 19, 2015, an Amended Complaint that properly alleges the citizenship of Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 5/5/15. (mc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.