Wood et al v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
Douglas R. Wood and Gregory S. Wood |
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company |
1:2015cv00260 |
September 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan L Collins |
Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 56 MOTION to Amend/Correct 41 Answer to Amended Complaint by Defendant Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company; GRANTING 57 MOTION for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint in the Alternative by Defendant Northwester n Mutual Life Insurance Company. Clerk DIRECTED to show the Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint (DE [56-1]) and the Third-Party Complaint in the Alternative (DE [57-1]) filed. Plaintiffs ORDERED to file by 1/19/2017 a supplemental statement as outlined in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 1/4/17. (cer) |
Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER re 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs have leave to amend their Complaint no later than 6/17/2016. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 5/19/16. (cer) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.