Kuberski v. Allied Recreation Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Kuberski
Defendant: Allied Recreation Group, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv00320
Filed: November 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 144 Bill of Costs filed by REV Recreation Group Inc. The R & R 158 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. In accordance with the R & R: Plaintiff's objection to Defendant's bill of costs 146 is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART; Defendant's bill of costs 144 is reduced from $8,853.38 to $7,956.42; and Enforcement of the bill of costs shall be STAYED pending appeal. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 2/1/2021. (lhc)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court issues the following rulings: Defendant's Motions in Limine 1, 4 and 10 90 are GRANTED as set forth in this Opinion and Order; Plaintiff's claims arising under Indiana law are DISMISSED; Plaintiff's alte rnatively pled claims arising under North Carolina law for breach of implied warranty, and violations of the UDTPA are DISMISSED. In light of the above rulings, Plaintiff's breach of express warranty under North Carolina law and his claim under the MMWA are the sole remaining claims for trial. The Court will issue additional rulings on the parties' Motions in Limine at the time of the final pretrial conference. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 9/2/2020. (bas)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 08/12/2019. (jat)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court OVERRULES Defendant's Objection to Report and Recommendation 68 , and ADOPTS in whole the Report and Recommendation 66 . Accordingly, Allied's Motion to Bar Plaintiff's Expert 31 is DENIED, and Kuberski's Motion to Exclude Douglas Haas' Testimony 34 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation 66 . Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 5/29/2019. (jss)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 25 in that sanctions in the amount of $8,247.20 in attorneys fees and travel expenses are awarded in Allieds favor; the motion is OTHERWISE DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 8/3/17. (nal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kuberski v. Allied Recreation Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Kuberski
Represented By: Ronald L Burdge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Recreation Group, Inc.
Represented By: Bruce S Terlep
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?