Bissonnette v. Podlaski et al
Matthew Bissonnette |
Kevin Podlaski and Carson Boxberger, LLP |
1:2015cv00334 |
November 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan L Collins |
Rudy Lozano |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 76 MOTION to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 filed by Kevin Podlaski, Carson Boxberger, LLP; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 137 MOTION for Summary Jud gment or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Kevin Podlaski, Carson Boxberger, LLP. This case is set for a telephonic scheduling conference on 6/14/2018 at 10:00 am. The Court will initiate the call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 6/5/18. (ksp) |
Filing 134 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' 43 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 8/21/2017. (jss) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER Bissonnette is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an amended complaint on or before November 24, 2015, that properly alleges the citizenship of Carson Boxberger, LLP, by setting forth the identity and citizenship of each of its partners, tracing through all applicable layers of ownership. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 11/12/15. (kjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.